|
Post by David Faltskog on Jan 30, 2007 17:48:01 GMT
The 3rd time this film has come out, there's a cycle emerging.....;-) Barry Yamaha, sounds like a dodgy 70's superhero... LOL ;D Brother of Damo Suzuki  D.F.
|
|
|
Post by Ashe Raven on Jan 30, 2007 20:05:34 GMT
The review is on there under Barry Yamaha, and is for the original release. Makes no difference. We've seen too many fake reviews and names to just yawn at the whole pathectic affair. Eating a little humbel and apologising for lying to us just isn't style is it? Or how about a simple: "Mistakes were made. I over reacted and lashed out at the wrong people. I maybe shoudl take time to reflect on this and hope the fans can appriciate that at least I tried. I may have not been entierly honest and for that I apologise, I can only hope that one day the fans can find it in them selves to be as humble to accept my apology and move on."It never ocne occured to you to do that did it? No, uh uh. You reap what you sow, and if you lie and continue to compond it with more lies, you get what you deserve.
|
|
|
Post by FALLINGSTAR on Jan 30, 2007 21:12:46 GMT
TIMMY HINES SUPERSTAR!!!!! SPEEDED ROUND THE CORNER ON HIS YAMAHA MADE A FILM........SAID IT'S BIG RIPPED OFF US FANS WITH HIS LITTLE DAMP SQUIB!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Lensman on Jan 30, 2007 21:48:14 GMT
This is the latest review for the dvd over on 'Amazon', classic ;D ;D ;D LMAO!! Thanks muchly for passing along a very entertaining read, JeffWayneFan! As has been stated before, Hines' -shells- shills are nearly as inept as his movie-making. If this means "special" in the sense of "special education" and "special olympics", then I agree Hines is very "special" indeed. But only on April Fools' Day. I guess it's just a rumor, then, that the body in Wells' grave is spinning with such force that it could provide England, Wales and Scotland with all electricity needs for the foreseeable future. Funny, I don't remember Wells describing the tripods as sailing across the landscape as though they were skating on a frozen pond... That wasn't acting. They were given an advance look at the CGI of the film's Martians, then asked if they thought it was done well. Call Guiness! This must be a world's record for feeling suspense. Not to mention the massive effort this "reviewer" put into creating such a tortured sentence.
|
|
|
Post by AlmicheV on Jan 31, 2007 10:39:25 GMT
The review is on there under Barry Yamaha, and is for the original release. Makes no difference. We've seen too many fake reviews and names to just yawn at the whole pathectic affair. Eating a little humbel and apologising for lying to us just isn't style is it? Or how about a simple: "Mistakes were made. I over reacted and lashed out at the wrong people. I maybe shoudl take time to reflect on this and hope the fans can appriciate that at least I tried. I may have not been entierly honest and for that I apologise, I can only hope that one day the fans can find it in them selves to be as humble to accept my apology and move on."It never ocne occured to you to do that did it? No, uh uh. You reap what you sow, and if you lie and continue to compond it with more lies, you get what you deserve. I know it makes no difference. I was pointing out to 'balance' (lol) where the review is.
|
|
|
Post by Ashe Raven on Jan 31, 2007 15:40:48 GMT
fair does
"Balance" in this films case is a very subjective term
|
|
|
Post by HTT on Feb 1, 2007 9:49:44 GMT
[glow=Purple,2,300]Well, it's been out a month - has anyone seen this third version yet?
I do have the original, but I never got the Directors Cut (as those who saw it just said it had been trimmed down). I'm interested to know what the differences are in this new "classic" edition.[/glow]
|
|