SEAN
Full Member
Posts: 146
|
Post by SEAN on Jun 12, 2005 10:09:40 GMT
Still awaiting my copy from amazon, however does anyone think that if Tim, and our Tony had done an audio commentary as one of the extras that much hilarity would of been had by all?
TH - "And this bit is where, er, er, our "monsters" got a bit upset and growled at the actors, who then had to act like startled fawns".
AP - "Yes, this was most distressing, I pooped myself and Tim said "OSCAR! ! !", and I was happy.
|
|
|
Post by dudalb on Jun 12, 2005 20:51:11 GMT
A Hines commentary might have been as good as the ones that Uwe Boll does to try to defend his films....
|
|
Jacko
Junior Member
Posts: 21
|
Post by Jacko on Jun 12, 2005 21:26:25 GMT
What possibly could he say to defend it. Not actually having seen it myself, (i don't want to nor will i be tortured into seeing it), the general concensus on this forum is that it's pants!
A better senario would be that he gives a proper critical analysis of his 'work' and decides its pants!
Now that would be something. For good measure Anthony Piana could chip in and decide that he is not at all like a Brad Pitt or an Al Pacino (well he's got the same initials so that must count for something, right?), and decide it was all a big mistake.
|
|
|
Post by ArmoredTrackLayer on Jun 13, 2005 5:16:11 GMT
from every thing i have heard tony wasnt that bad of an actor, I dont want to drag him down cause he worked with mr. hinds
|
|
|
Post by maniacs on Jun 13, 2005 22:10:49 GMT
Too right. It was Hines who said it not AP.
|
|